024-9900353

真相是啥?本泽马伤情引发名誉官司,德尚起诉记者诽谤案开庭(本泽马伤情风波升级:德尚起诉记者诽谤案开庭,真相待揭)

首页 > 新闻中心

Evaluating news fetch options

I can only use shell commands, and while I could use curl to fetch news, it requires network access. It seems to be allowed, but there might be restrictions that could escalate if there's a failure. Should I get approval? The user's request is open-ended, asking for the truth and wants a summary of known facts versus speculation. I plan to outline a timeline, claims from involved parties, and also touch on the legal aspects in France.Structuring defamation approach

I need to be careful to avoid any defamation and should present information as allegations while disclaiming anything uncertain. I plan to create a concise, structured answer with bullet points to clearly lay out the timeline, positions, documented details, and what remains unclear.

So, for context: At the 2022 World Cup, Benzema had a hamstring/quad injury, left Qatar on November 19, and wasn't replaced. France made it to the final. He returned to training by December 10 and played a friendly on December 15. It looks like he was competitive again for Real Madrid by December 30.Analyzing claims and positions

He retired from international play on December 19, 2022, just after the final. There are allegations that a journalist claimed Deschamps lied about the seriousness of Benzema's injury, suggesting he could have stayed on the roster. It’s debated whether Benzema was fit enough by December 1.

Deschamps maintains that the decision was based on medical advice, as an MRI revealed a grade 2 tear, making a return uncertain. The MRI report has been discussed too, suggesting a recovery timeline that would make Benzema available around December 10, but it seems risky for the later matches.Clarifying the situation

After Benzema returned, Real Madrid conducted extra tests, and he resumed training on December 10. However, it seems he didn't play in any friendlies and made his league match appearance only on December 30. So, he wasn't "immediately" available.

show

On the legal side, the suit is against a specific journalist, possibly "Romain Molina," "Daniel Riolo," or "Nabil Djellit." In French defamation law, the plaintiff must show injury, and the defendant can prove truth or good-faith critique. Since I don't have the exact name, I plan to refer to the journalist vaguely but might also ask the user for further clarification.Summarizing court examination details

I can outline what the court will look at, including medical reports, WhatsApp exchanges among staff, internal notes from FFF, and the player availability list. I’ll also suggest key items to watch like the hearing schedule, judgment date, possible damages, and any apology orders.

the

I’ll keep the information concise and in bullet form, avoiding heavy formatting. It’s important to produce a clear primer contrasting known facts with what’s still unclear. Plus, I can offer to look up court filings or French press articles if the user shares a link.

这里先把“争议点”“各方说法”“已知事实”和“尚不确定”梳理清楚,方便你判断。

  • 事件背景

    • 2022 卡塔尔世界杯开赛前夕,本泽马在法国队集训中大腿前侧受伤,随后离队。法国队未征召替补,最终打到决赛。
    • 其后多名媒体人称“伤势没那么重/本可赶上淘汰赛/德尚不愿其回归”等,德尚认为这些说法损害名誉,遂以诽谤起诉相关记者,现已进入开庭阶段。
  • 各方核心说法

    situa

    • 记者的指控(要点):法国队夸大伤情;本泽马原本有望赶上半决赛或决赛;教练组主观上不想让他回队。
    • 德尚与国家队医疗组:按当时影像学与功能评估,属于需要数周康复的伤(媒体多次提到接近“II级撕裂/拉伤”范畴);为不占用名额且避免复发风险,决定让球员离队;否认主观排斥。
  • 可核实的时间线与事实

    • 受伤与离队:2022-11-19 前后受伤并退队,属赛前最后阶段。
    • 常规康复周期:此类股直肌/股四头肌中至重度拉伤,临床常见回归训练在2–4周、回归比赛更久,个体差异大,且复发风险高。
    • 本泽马回到皇马后:约12月中旬恢复合练,正式比赛出场在12月30日西甲复赛。他并未在世界杯期间为任何球队登场。
    • 结论含义:从纯时间上看,“理论上”决赛时接近康复窗口,但是否能承担世界大赛高对抗强度、是否医学与竞技双重达标,并不能从赛后单一事实倒推确定。
  • 法庭将重点审什么

    • 当时的影像学报告、医疗记录与功能测试记录;队医与外部专家的书面意见。
    • 教练组/足协内部沟通记录(邮件/消息)以判断是否存在非医疗动机的决策。
    • 记者信息来源的可靠性与核查过程:在法国诽谤案中,真实确证或“善意、基于充分事实基础的公共利益讨论”是常见抗辩。
  • 目前能说的“真相边界”

    • 硬事实:受伤真实存在;离队决定发生在伤后不久;球员世界杯期间未复出;赛后约两周才重返正式比赛。
    • 争议点:当时是否“可以/应当”选择让其留队静养等待复出、是否存在非医疗因素影响决策、媒体指控是否越界为诽谤。
    • 没有公开证据能定论“夸大伤情”或“本可稳妥出战半决赛/决赛”。这类判断需要当时的影像细节和功能测试,而非事后表现倒推。
  • 对你关心的“真相是啥”的务实回答

    • 最保守、与已知事实不矛盾的说法是:伤势达到需数周康复级别,是否能赶上世界杯末段存在医学与竞技不确定性;教练组选择了风险最低的球队管理方案。媒体的“本可出战/被排斥”属于尚未被证实的指控,现已进入司法程序,由证据说话。

如果你指的是某位具体记者的这起案子,发我链接或名字,我可以按案件材料与法庭当天要点给你更精确的梳理与可能判决走向。